<$BlogRSDURL$>
Return to Main Page | Ragout: Dealing with Saddam
Ragout
A Spicy Stew of Economics, Politics, Data, Food, Carpentry, etc.
 
Saturday, July 03, 2004

Dealing with Saddam


Spencer Ackerman at The New Republic's Iraq'd, writes
Perhaps the most surprising finding in the poll is what Iraqis consider not to be a priority at all. By a tremendously vast margin--83.7 percent, with the next most-frequent response (about increasing oil production) coming in with only 6 percent--Iraqis are not concerned with "dealing with the members of the previous government."

Ackerman assumes that this means that Iraqis don't care much about Saddam's trial. Perhaps they don't want him to be tried at all. But "deal" doesn't mean "put on trial," it means something weaker like "take action towards." Another common meaning of "deal with" is "bargain with." Since the poll was presumably translated into Arabic and Kurdish, it isn't at all clear exactly what was asked, and what Iraqis understood it to mean.

The relevant part of the dictionary definition is:
Deal, verb intransitive
3 a : to engage in bargaining : TRADE b : to sell or distribute something as a business
4 a : to take action with regard to someone or something [deal with an offender] b : to reach or try to reach a state of acceptance or reconcilement [trying to deal with her son's death]

So a common meaning of "dealing with the members of the previous government" is "bargaining with them." Another reasonable interpretation is Ackerman's "taking action towards them." A bad translation could even be "accepting the loss of the previous government."

In general, we ought to be very cautious about interpreting polls translated into a foreign language, where we don't know the connotation of the questions. Even in English, the exacting wording of questions can make a big difference. Consider the popularity of "aid to the poor" and the unpopularity of "welfare." This problem must be even worse in polls translated into multiple foreign languages, like the Pew global surveys.
 
|










































Number 1 in Ragout Economics!

ARCHIVES
March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 /

LINKS
First Team
Angry Bear
Atrios
Crooked Timber
Brad DeLong
Econbrowser
Economist's View
Freakonomics
Mark Kleiman
Nathan Newman
Political Animal
Max Sawicky
Brian Setser
Sock Thief
Talking Points Memo
Tapped
Matthew Yglesias

Second Opinion
Stephen Bainbridge
Marginal Revolution
Andrew Samwick
The Volokh Conspiracy

Third Way
Fafblog
NewDonkey

Fourth Estate
Economic Reporting Review
New York Times
Slate
Washington Post

Fifth Republic
Ceteris-Paribus
Econoclaste
Le Figaro
Le Monde

Sixth Sense
Deltoid
The Intersection
In the Pipeline
What's New

Politics & Polls
Daily Kos
Donkey Rising
Electoral Vote Predictor
MyDD
PollingReport
PollKatz
Rasmussen Tracking Polls

Other
Art Sucks
Enzo Titolo
L’esprit d’escalier
A Level Gaze
Approximately Perfect


EMAIL
ragoutchef at yahoo dot com

[ATOM]

Powered by Blogger