<$BlogRSDURL$>
Return to Main Page | Ragout: Europe: Lack of Competitiveness or High Interest Rates?
Ragout
A Spicy Stew of Economics, Politics, Data, Food, Carpentry, etc.
 
Wednesday, September 01, 2004

Europe: Lack of Competitiveness or High Interest Rates?


This article in the US business press discusses Europe's economic problems, and concludes that Europe needs to cut corporate taxes, reduce social benefits such as health, pensions, and unemployment insurance, and deregulate. The article is allegedly news, not opinion, although why standard boilerplate that you can read any day of the week in the business press is news is a mystery to me.

Europe is slipping further behind the U.S. in competitiveness as the leaders of Germany, France and Italy, weakened by election setbacks, fail to take advantage of the economic recovery to reduce taxes and over-regulation.
...
Germany, the continent's largest economy, abounds with reasons why Western Europe is losing the competition for investment and jobs to the U.S., China and India -- and the low-tax Eastern European countries that, after entering the European Union in May, are competing right on Germany's doorstep.

German labor costs are six times the Eastern European level, according to a report published on August 24 by the Cologne-based IW research institute. A corporate tax rate of 37 percent is almost twice that of neighboring Slovakia, which now makes more cars per person than any other Eastern country.
Now, the weird thing is that this nonsense is believed not only by corporate executives, for whom it's welcome propaganda against the welfare state, but also by anti-globalizers. The article says that increased trade leads to increased competitiveness which leads to falling living standards. The anti-globalizers draw the natural conclusion that increased trade is a bad thing.

I'll confine myself to pointing out one obvious problem with the argument: yes Slovakia's wages are lower than Germany's, but their productivity is lower too. Germany's wages aren't about to fall by a factor of six. Even if one can make a theoretical argument that this should happen (and you can't, because of the productivity differential) it never has happened in the history of the world.

But the real problem with the article is that it makes no mention of monetary policy, and the strains caused by the Euro. Overregulation of the labor market may plan some role in raising Europe's unemployment rates (or it may not, some European countries have "rigid" labor markets and low unemployment). But monetary policy is at least as likely a cause of slow growth and high unemployment as a lack of "competitiveness," whatever that is.

Here's an excerpt from an interesting article in the conservative UK Daily Telegraph, which discusses how monetary union is very bad for the low inflation coutries of Europe: they end up with high real interest rates, because of tight monetary policies aimed at fighting inflation elsewhere. The Telegraph actually tries to inform its readers about their economy, rather than writing propaganda. Perhaps this is because European readers want good analysis of their own countries, while American readers of the business section are happy to settle for comforting lies about faraway places.

France and Germany have the same nominal interest rate, set by the European Central Bank. It stands at 2 per cent, having been gradually reduced from 4.75 per cent since May 2001.

It is widely appreciated that rates haven't been cut far or fast enough for Germany. High inflation elsewhere in the euro zone has discouraged the ECB from taking more radical action.

What is less well understood is that economic divergence makes these pressures of policy mismatch much worse. Faster growth in France, for instance, brings higher French inflation - an average of 2.5 per cent this year, compared with 1.5 per cent in Germany.

So Germany's inflation-adjusted interest rate (its real interest rate) is actually above that of France. Perversely, then, struggling euro members are landed with interest rates that are not only too high for their own purposes (given that the ECB sets rates with reference to all members) but slow-growth economies end up with real costs of capital that are even higher than other members who are already growing quite well.



 
|










































Number 1 in Ragout Economics!

ARCHIVES
March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 /

LINKS
First Team
Angry Bear
Atrios
Crooked Timber
Brad DeLong
Econbrowser
Economist's View
Freakonomics
Mark Kleiman
Nathan Newman
Political Animal
Max Sawicky
Brian Setser
Sock Thief
Talking Points Memo
Tapped
Matthew Yglesias

Second Opinion
Stephen Bainbridge
Marginal Revolution
Andrew Samwick
The Volokh Conspiracy

Third Way
Fafblog
NewDonkey

Fourth Estate
Economic Reporting Review
New York Times
Slate
Washington Post

Fifth Republic
Ceteris-Paribus
Econoclaste
Le Figaro
Le Monde

Sixth Sense
Deltoid
The Intersection
In the Pipeline
What's New

Politics & Polls
Daily Kos
Donkey Rising
Electoral Vote Predictor
MyDD
PollingReport
PollKatz
Rasmussen Tracking Polls

Other
Art Sucks
Enzo Titolo
L’esprit d’escalier
A Level Gaze
Approximately Perfect


EMAIL
ragoutchef at yahoo dot com

[ATOM]

Powered by Blogger