<$BlogRSDURL$>
Return to Main Page | Ragout: Black Box Voting
Ragout
A Spicy Stew of Economics, Politics, Data, Food, Carpentry, etc.
 
Wednesday, October 20, 2004

Black Box Voting


My prediction for the Presidential election is: Kerry wins in a landslide, and then right-wingers spend the next four years charging ballot fraud.

That's what seems to be happening in Venezuela. Today, a friend emailed me an essay about the latest round in the battle over Venezuela's Presidential recall vote of two months ago. Venezuela's election was conducted using a mix of paper ballots and electronic voting. The electronic voting machines produced a paper trail, a print-out of the voter's choice that was deposited in a ballot box. The election was observed by the Carter Center, which, among other things, conducted an audit comparing a large random sample of the paper print-outs to the votes recorded in the machines.

In other words, the election seems to have been run a whole lot better than most US elections. And the result was a landslide, meaning that minor, Florida-style glitches wouldn't matter. And yet the Venezuelan opposition, and US right-wingers, have been screaming about electronic ballot fraud.

There's even been a battle of the econometricians (incumbent/opposition). The opposition first charged that there were a suspicious number of polling places where multiple machines showed the same number of "yes" votes. That is, in one polling place two machines might have both recorded 283 "yes" votes; in another, two machines might have both recorded 391 "yes" votes; this was alleged to have happened too many times. The charge has since been refuted, with both sides' statisticians agreeing that the ties were coincidence, not evidence of fraud.

My impression is that the claim about suspicious ties was absurd on its face, and yet it generated several months of heated charges and counter-charges. And of course, now there's a new charge, with the opposition and their statisticians claiming that the Carter Center's audit wasn't truly random. I don't know whether the new charge is true or not, though I'm inclined to believe the Carter Center, which says the elections were fair.

But either way, I wouldn't be surprised if Venezuela's ongoing fight over ballot fraud (or lack thereof) is in our future. After all, US right-wingers have already been practicing up for the battle.

 
|










































Number 1 in Ragout Economics!

ARCHIVES
March 2004 / April 2004 / May 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 /

LINKS
First Team
Angry Bear
Atrios
Crooked Timber
Brad DeLong
Econbrowser
Economist's View
Freakonomics
Mark Kleiman
Nathan Newman
Political Animal
Max Sawicky
Brian Setser
Sock Thief
Talking Points Memo
Tapped
Matthew Yglesias

Second Opinion
Stephen Bainbridge
Marginal Revolution
Andrew Samwick
The Volokh Conspiracy

Third Way
Fafblog
NewDonkey

Fourth Estate
Economic Reporting Review
New York Times
Slate
Washington Post

Fifth Republic
Ceteris-Paribus
Econoclaste
Le Figaro
Le Monde

Sixth Sense
Deltoid
The Intersection
In the Pipeline
What's New

Politics & Polls
Daily Kos
Donkey Rising
Electoral Vote Predictor
MyDD
PollingReport
PollKatz
Rasmussen Tracking Polls

Other
Art Sucks
Enzo Titolo
L’esprit d’escalier
A Level Gaze
Approximately Perfect


EMAIL
ragoutchef at yahoo dot com

[ATOM]

Powered by Blogger